The key factor has been a change of Government for the UK. Labour intended to have us recover from this buy “booming” its way out of the mess. The Tory led coalition has chosen a more prudent method of cost cutting to help reduce the budget deficit which works in 75% of cases versus only a 25% success rate for Labour’s policy.

What this has meant is that (to date at least) the UK has not been downgraded by credit agencies, keeping it attractive to foreign investment and taking pressure of interest rates as a result.

So where for Interest Rates now?

A cooling global economy and an impending austerity squeeze in Britain will make the Bank of England (BoE) wait well into next year before hiking interest rates, a poll of 60 economists suggests.  They expect the BoE to hike its base rate by the end of the second quarter of 2011, starting with a 0.25% rise from its present record low of 0.5%, according to the  Reuters poll.  For the first time this year, no economist thought the Bank would raise rates before the end of 2010, something considered a foregone conclusion in polls conducted this time last year.

Increased austerity measures and a growing chance European economies will follow the U.S. economy in slowing down are overriding concerns about above-target inflation, the poll suggests.  The full extent of the government’s budget cuts will be detailed by each ministry in October.  Britain’s economy expanded 1.2% in Q2, its fastest pace for nine years, but analysts expect this to shrink to 0.3-0.5% in each quarter through to the end of next year.  Retail sales and consumer confidence figures over the last month have been buoyant, but business surveys of the private sector support expectations for a slowdown.  Inflation slowed in July to 3.1%, stubbornly above the Bank’s 2% target and one reason why Monetary Policy Committee member Andrew Sentance has voted for a hike at the last three rate-setting meetings.

So what does this mean to you and I?

Well, for borrowers it means mortgage interest rates are likely to remain at their current level until at least the end of the year. Quarter 2 next year indicates, around Spring time for the potential of rate rises. However, I now doubt interest rates will rise sharply as this will inhibit the ongoing recovery. Mortgage Lenders are already raking in huge profits on mortgages currently due to their wide margins when compared to base rate. This has been shown by the huge profits for the banks following the huge losses in recent times, post credit crunch. They will no doubt pass on any rate rises and their products will change before the actual rise occurs.

Therefore if you are considering a remortgage as a result of possible rate rises then January/ February, is probably the time to give us a call.

For savers we are looking at continued poor interest rate returns  on deposits for a good period yet. Many such clients are now looking to Dividend Income on shares to boost their incomes. Whilst share values may remain relatively static in the short term Companies issuing shares are expected to increase Dividends as they look to attract new monies for investment to allow them to expand and grow. This is potentially good news for investors who are willing to take some risk.

So whether it is mortgage advice or investment advice now is as good a time to review matters. So give John or I a call and we will get an appointment in the diary.

The extract provides clients with an interesting insight into what Anthony has been up to, since the fund launched.

“Renowned stockpicker Anthony Bolton has wasted no time getting down to business in the Far East, fully investing his £471m China Special Situations trust.

Bolton, who has visited more than 150 companies since arriving in Hong Kong, believes China could lead global markets when the bull market resumes later in the year.

The esteemed manager talks to Investment Week about his return to fund management and where the best Chinese prospects can be found.

The fund has been running for three months now, are you enjoying the challenge?

It has been a good four months. It is great to get the fund up and running. Markets could have been better, but on the other hand from an investing point of view it has been quite good to have a soft background because it makes buying some of the smaller stocks easier.

From a personal point of view, how have you found running money again?

For a number of years I have been fascinated by China, so just being here and seeing the companies is fantastic. With some of the medium and smaller stocks is the amount of focused coverage is minimal, which really is exciting for someone like myself. There are more chances of finding something that has been missed or is not fully appreciated.
The bit I found I was quite happy to give up when I stopped running money was the information overload bit. I knew I would have to take this up again, so I am telling my brokers more this time what I do and do not want.

You previously said the opportunities in the Chinese market reminded you of Europe in the 80s, has it met your expectations?

It has definitely met my expectations, particularly in the medium and smaller companies. It is a long time since I could look up a company and find no broker research on it, or the last note was nine months old.

How have you set up the trust, do you have strong weightings in these small and mid caps?

I have got about a hundred holdings in the fund. In terms of market cap split, if you say that large cap is over $5bn, it is about 43% of the fund compared to 75% for the MSCI benchmark.
Then I have got about 56% in medium and small-cap shares. In mid-cap, which we count as $1bn to $5bn, I am about 34% against the 24% benchmark. The area that I am really different is in small caps. I have got about 22% in stocks under $1bn, which is under 1% of the benchmark.

What areas of the market are you focusing on?

My whole thesis is simple. The economic drivers of China are changing away from the export manufacturing towards the domestic economy. Most of what I have bought plays to this theme. Key sectors like retailing – such as department stores, sports goods, electrical goods, shoes, jewellery etc.
Then other consumer areas like wines and spirits, restaurants, hotels, cars, mobile telecom and some Internet names. Financials is another broadly domestic sector, and some of the distributors, a few companies standing on big discounts to the underlying assets. So it is a wide range.

After the strong recent sell-off, are there any areas of the market which now appear materially undervalued?

Towards the smaller cap end I can find some very low valuations. I think there are broadly two types of stocks I have bought. There are those which are real value plays, where some of these medium and smaller stocks actually have valuations lower than their western equivalents, which I found strange because they have got better growth.
Then there is a broader group, perhaps is a bit more mid-cap oriented, which I think can produce very good growth over the next five to ten years. These would be a bit more expensive than the western equivalents, but they are growing considerably faster.
One of the things I have tried to do is think about what business models have worked in the West, and can I find the same business model at a much earlier stage of its development in China? If I see a company with a business model where I know that has not worked in Europe or the rest of the world, it tends to put me off.

You are more receptive to the state-owned enterprises than you were previously, why is this?

Previously I had a much more black or white view – which was to always avoid the state owned buy the private company. Now I have got a mixture. At the large cap end it is very difficult not to buy state owned enterprises, because most of these are. But I believe some of the managements are changing. Managements are being incentivised in a more favourable way, they are getting incentivised relative to the share price which is a new phenomenon.
I have still got a bit of bias for a private company, but the state owned enterprises are probably a bit less risky. The upside is probably less but the risk is less.

You have already met more than 150 companies, how have you found corporate governance out there?

The good ones are as good as you get in Europe, but the poor ones are generally worse. This has reinforced my view. Over half the meetings have been in English, which was more than I thought. It may be a reflection of the types of companies that I have been more interested in, and maybe where they are listed is a factor.
But one of the things I have spent time developing is the cross-checking mechanism. How can I not just rely on the companies telling me? How can I do due diligence and re-check things? Putting together a network of people who can work on these issues has been one of the important steps I have been taking.

What is our view on the current state of the Chinese economy? Does the tightening concern you?

I have said for a while China is tightening. It has got a delicate balance, so if it tightens too much it will kill growth and growth is the golden goose in China which everything else flows out of. But if they do not tighten enough they are going to continue to get property bubbles and inflation. I think what I see is reasonable, certainly the Chinese economy is growing less fast than it was, but it moved from a 10% to 12% growth range in real GDP terms to just less than 10%. I see that as reasonably good news.
Where we have seen the biggest changes in policy is probably in property. I previously said that if there were there any bubbles in China, I did not see it in the equity market but there was in the property market in some cities. The Government has tackled this, the measures are the most dramatic we have seen ever.
Because China was much earlier with its tightening than most other countries, I believe it might start to loosen the tightening a bit as we get towards the end of the year. I think it might be one of the catalysts for the market to start going up again.

Why are you so confident the bull market will resume later in the year?

I do not have as strong a market view as I had at the beginning of last year, when I felt all the signs were aligned for a change in trend. But from early on I felt we were in a multi-year bull market. Most bull markets are more than one year in my experience. We always were going to have a decent consolidation phase in the bull market and this is what we have seen.
Why do I think it is going to go up? We are returning to a low growth world in the West and not a double dip. I am not expecting economies to go back into reverse but if they did I would have to revise my views. It would not make me ultra-bearish though.
As we have lived through one of the worst downturns we have ever seen and the financial crisis, we have all got too influenced by the recent past. So when you have seen a crisis you are expecting the next one. My view is the sort of thing we went through is a once in a lifetime, those do not come along often.
I am not saying there are no problems in Europe, but one of the catalysts for this consolidation has been the euro and the problems Spain and Greece. With a bit of time, people will see it is not as terrible as some of the bears think.
While you have still got very low interest rates in the world, and a lot of liquidity, if people get a little bit of confidence back they will look at risk assets again. What normally stops the bull market is a substantial rise in interest rates. But it is not the first one or two rises; it is when interest rates have been rising for six to nine months. That phase I think is still a reasonably long way off.
Putting China into that context actually on the A-Shares you have had a bear market, the shares have been going down for a year. The valuations now have come back about as low as they have been relative to the Hong Kong shares on the average.
One of the interesting questions is which markets will lead in the next phase? There is a chance some of the emerging markets like China, which led in the first phase of the bull market, could lead again in the next phase.

The trust’s NAV has fallen since the April launch, are you confident of quickly reversing this?

It would be lovely to make money from day one, but life is not like that. I have not sold this to people on the basis it was a short-term hit. My view is the medium-term growth story in China, particularly on this change in the economic dynamic. I believe it will be perceived over the next few years as one of the great global growth stories, and that will attract foreign money back into China.
I have not changed at all on this, but in the short-term it has been choppy. If we are sitting here in a year’s time and there has been no improvement I may have to change it, but at the moment I think markets will start to move up again later this year.

Has the investment trust structure been beneficial?

It has really worked when you consider my exposure to mid and small-cap stocks. It has allowed me to go more into those stocks and over time I might even go a bit more than I am today. If I had had a mutual fund, where I would have had to worry about short-term liquidity, it might have made it more difficult.

What is on your radar in the near-term, over the next six months or so?

On this timescale, I am waiting for the bull market to resume. In terms of what I am doing, this is a job where it is very much more of the same. I will go and see a lot more companies. I am back in the mainland again next week and will be seeing more companies. I am deepening my knowledge.”

Any clients wanting more information on this fund or investing in markets such as China, India etc should give us a call as soon as possible.

Here is a summary of the key points:

• Income tax personal allowances for basic rate tax payer to rise to £7,475
• Personal Allowance for Higher Rate Tax payers remains the same
• Capital gains tax to rise to 28% for Higher Rate Taxpayers immediately
• Large Company Corporation tax to fall from 28% to 24% over 4 years
• Small Companies Corporation Tax reduced to 20% from next year
• Threshold at which Employers pay National Insurance to rise by £21 per week above indexation
• VAT to rise from 18% to 20% in 4th Jan 2011
• Tax credits cut for families earning over £40,000 per annum
• No increases in duty on fuel / alcohol and tobacco
• Levy on Banks to recoup £2 billion per annum to which France and Germany have also agreed
• Public sector pay for those on £21,000 or more frozen for 2 years
• Freeze on funds for the Royal Family
• Housing Benefit capped at £400 per week – saving £1.8 billion per annum
• Medical Assessment for those on Disability Living Allowance
• Proposed State pension age rise to 66 to be speeded up

In summary there are tax rises for the High Earners and tax cuts for the lower paid.

The government expects government spending to be balanced by 2015 to 2016, rising in the short term and falling thereafter. Government expenditure is expected to fall by £30 billion more than proposed by Labour. The Coalition is proposing to solve the crisis via a 77% spending cuts to 33% tax rise principle.

Inflation is expected to peak at 2.7% by the end of 2010. Unemployment is expected to peak at 8.1% this year and fall to 6.1% over 4 years.

I expect this budget to be in line with market expectations and hence have a limited impact on the market as a whole.  I do believe this budget will be seen as a strong step towards addressing the UK’s financial problems and hence quite possibly will be warmly received by credit rating agencies.

It is vital the UK doesnt get downgraded by such agencies as this will force up interest rates in the longer term.

My view – The unions don’t like the budget so that probably means it is a good one!!

Since then the Bank has offered a 100% guarantee on monies held in the bank, regardless of the sum involved.

As of 5pm tonight, all clients need to be aware that the safety net reverts to the standard £50,000 in cash, which is the case as with other banks not backed by the Government.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme currently protects funds of up to £50,000 on deposit where the Bank or Building Society goes bust.

The previous Government had effectively promised to protect all UK savings regardless of whether it had financially backed the bank or not, so in theory we were all safe as long as the UK government didn’t go bust!

If you have in excess of £50,000 on deposit you are well advised to spread the money around. Feel free to give us a call to get advice on suitable Banks and their accounts.

But what is Short Selling?

Certain traders on the markets borrow stocks from lenders and then sell them, expecting the price to fall. They then buy the stock back at the lower price and return the stock to the lender, keeping the difference in price.

Example

Trader A borrows ABC stock valued at £1. It sells it to Trader B at this price.

The price of the stock falls to 50p.

Trader A then buys the stock back at the lower price making a handsome profit as it returns the stock to the lender.

In particular there is a way of trading called “naked” short selling, which the German Government is looking to ban.

This is the same as above but where Trader A, in my example, sells the stock to Trader B before even borrowing it from the Lender.

The impact of this form of trading is believed to be causing unnecessary fears about the stability of certain stocks or bonds. Many believe it is playing a role in the volatility of Portuguese and Greek govt bonds.

So why did this impact on the markets?

The markets have panicked amid concerns about other nations following suit and the possible impact this may have on the bond and equity markets as a whole. A major issue here is the fact that Germany, as a Euro zone country, has yet again acted independently of other Euro zone nations potentially impacting on all of them.

This causes significant concerns about the stability of the Euro.

Many governments are currently reviewing the concept of Short Selling. Personally the sooner it is banned permanently the better!

Without doubt the biggest offender leading to complaints were the Banks with 61% of the total complaints received. Complaints received relating to advice given by IFAs was down 1/3 to just 2%.

No industry is perfect and we would love these figures to be even lower but the reality is, it clearly shows that clients generally get far better advice and service from  IFAs,  as they are much less likely to complain.

It is further worth noting that of those complaints, less than 1/3 were upheld by the Ombudsman indicating that the majority of complaints against IFAS were unjust in any event.

Other offenders on the list were the sellers of general insurance. In their case over 90% of complaints against the sellers were upheld. Many of these complaints related to the sale of payment protection insurance.

Clients, I say to you now, it is vital you seriously consider whether this insurance is appropriate for you. Few insurers will pay out if you are self-employed and often the sellers of such insurance will only have one product to sell you and will badger you to take that whether or not it is appropriate.

At Moffatt Financial Planning Ltd, we have access to a range of insurers providing such cover, and we will not hesitate to advise against such cover if we feel it is inappropriate for you personally.

Moral of the story….. don’t get financial advice from your Bank and consider an IFA regardless of which financial product you are considering taking out. This way you can be sure the product has been properly researched and the best on the market for your own needs.

Better still get advice from Chartered Financial Planners, the most qualified of advisers…….. did I mention John and I are Chartered?

Now it seems, the banks have formulated their own view on how their clients are classified. Remember, this could be you and I.

Barclays Bank, it has emerged, refer to their clients as “Conquests”!!!

The sort of term you might associate used by an immature teenage boy who has just had his wicked way with a girl in his class, behind the bike sheds.

The source goes on to say that the Barclays staff are under intense pressure to sell stocks and shares ISAs, earning £49 for every £1,000, as opposed to just 18p if a client’s money goes into cash. He also accepts that the structured products the bank offers its customers are “rubbish” .

This philosophy goes against all the principles associated with the advice we offer as Chartered Financial Planners. We are happy to recommend whichever investment suits our clients based on their own attitude to risk. Our advisers are salaried and do not have any “sales targets”. We give the appropriate advice for each and everyone of our clients.

This information was leaked by Barclays staff so can be taken as read. It is a clear illustration that clients should be very careful if considering taking advice from a bank financial adviser.

Without doubt the best solution is to use an Independent Financial Adviser, preferably Chartered like John and I, where you will receive the correct advice and an ongoing service to ensure your investments offer the right solution for you both now and in future.

Of course the falls aren’t all about the election, with big concerns about the situation in Europe.

The pound has fallen sharply in currency terms due to the election situation. The markets are very concerned about the desirability of UK Govt Bonds and hence the ability of the UK Govt to repay its debt and end up like Greece, Portugal and Spain. A hung parliament may mean the inability of an acting Government to impose new legislation to ensure the UK recovers quickly from the recession.

These are very real concerns and should not be underestimated. However if the Tories can forge a coalition with the Liberals, quickly, these concerns may be short lived.

One big problem is that Gordon came to power by his own choice and not by choice of either his party, his party’s supporters or the public. He has bullied off two attempts to remove him by his own party, so he is unlikely to go quietly.

In this case it is vital the Country comes first and not Gordon’s personal desires so it is incredibly important for Cameron and Clegg to do a deal quickly giving Gordon no choice but to pack his bags and move out of No.10.

The next couple of days are crucial so fingers crossed as our investments and pensions are paying the price yet again for Labour’s failings.

As commented in my previous blog all the Fund Managers are united for once in that they believe a Hung Parliament will have a negative impact on the markets. Concerns about introducing the necessary legislation to ensure recovery continues is the biggest concern.

They are united therefore in the view that a clear majority for one party is the best way forward. The polls indicate a majority for the Tories with no real chance of a Liberal or Labour win. We can ignore what the politicians tell us as we know they talk rubbish.

My view is simple. Our pensions and Investments have suffered enough over the last few years. We should put ourselves first for a change and vote to protect our savings and investments and protect our future. We should vote for a clear majority this week.

If you are not a Tory and I confess for my sins, I am, then may I recommend your vote for them anyway? If you are about to retire or draw on any of our investments etc, then it is a particularly important vote!

Remember they are going to tax us anyway, so you might as well have more before they tax you, as you will certainly have less when they have.

To ease concerns I asked for feedback from Prudential and confirm below Rob Devey, Pru Chief Exec’s, comments:

“Let me address the press speculation head on.  You must all be getting very bored of it by now (I know I certainly am) but it doesn’t stop it from destabilising our friends and family, our customers and indeed us all.  But let’s remember that it is simply speculation and nothing has changed.  As I said very clearly at the roadshows, we don’t have plans to sell the UK business.  It’s a fantastic asset for the Group – so fantastic, in fact, that I’m sure there are plenty of people who’d like to buy it, and yes, people have asked in the past and no doubt will in the future.  Sadly, this is one of the things we have to bear with being the UK’s most profitable insurer, with the best brand, the best people and unrivalled skills in the areas that we focus on.

We said at the time that we launched the AIA deal on 1st March, we knew that there would be a lot of media noise, particularly in the run-up to the launch of the rights issue, and that’s exactly what we’re seeing.  All I can ask, as ever, is for us to keep our heads down and keep working away for our customers and our intermediary and other distribution partners.  Long term performance will always shine through.”

Hope this eases any concerns you may have. I believe Prudential still offers great products for clients and would suggest limited notice be taken of press speculation.